1. Introduction
This question assesses whether you can distinguish true review success factors from statements that are incorrect or misleading.
Static testing (including reviews) finds defects, not failures. 정적 테스트(리뷰 포함)는 결함(defects)을 찾으며, 실패(failures)는 실행 기반 테스트에서 발생합니다.
2. Key Concepts
✔ Success Factors in Reviews
- Adequate time allocation 충분한 시간 배정
- Review small, manageable parts 작은 단위로 나누어 리뷰
- Respectful and collaborative behavior 존중하는 태도와 협력적인 분위기
- Objective handling of findings 발견된 결함을 객관적으로 처리
3. Practice Question
❓ Question
Which of these statements is NOT a factor that contributes to successful reviews?
- a) Participants should dedicate adequate time for the review
- b) Splitting large work products into small parts to make the required effort less intense
- c) Participants should avoid behaviors that might indicate boredom, exasperation, or hostility to other participants
- d) Failures found should be acknowledged, appreciated, and handled objectively
✅ Correct Answer: d)
📘 Explanation (EN/KR)
-
a) Not correct. Allocating enough time is a known review success factor.
충분한 시간을 할당하는 것은 성공적인 리뷰의 핵심 요인입니다. -
b) Not correct. Splitting work products into smaller parts increases review effectiveness.
산출물을 작은 단위로 나누면 리뷰 효율성이 증가합니다. -
c) Not correct. Participants avoiding negative behaviors contributes to a safe and effective review environment.
부정적 태도를 피하는 것은 안전하고 생산적인 리뷰 환경을 만듭니다. -
d) Correct. Reviews identify defects, not failures.
“Failures” occur only during dynamic testing when code is executed.
리뷰는 결함(defects)을 찾는 활동이며, 실패(failures)는 동적 테스트 실행 중에만 발생합니다.
✔ Therefore, option (d) is the only statement that does NOT represent a success factor.
✔ 따라서 (d)만 성공 요소와 무관한 문장입니다.
📊 Summary Table
| Option | Statement | Success Factor? | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Adequate time for review | ✔ Yes | 충분한 시간은 성공 요소 |
| b | Split work into smaller parts | ✔ Yes | 작은 단위 리뷰는 효과적 |
| c | Avoid negative behaviors | ✔ Yes | 협업 분위기 조성 |
| d | “Failures” handled objectively | ❌ No | 리뷰는 결함 찾기 활동, 실패 아님 |
4. Summary & Call to Action
Understanding what contributes to successful reviews helps strengthen your knowledge of static testing and prepares you for real-world QA collaboration. refer to : FL-3.2.5
성공적인 리뷰 요인을 이해하면 정적 테스트 전반을 더 잘 이해하고 실제 QA 협업에서도 큰 도움이 됩니다.
Related: More ISTQB Posts| 다음 문제